Questions of Honest Cross-Examination - what was never asked?

////////

QUESTIONS AN HONEST BARRISTER WOULD HAVE ASKED IN A NON-RIGGED COURT

1.1

Would you say you hold a responsible position as a legal secretary in the busy criminal defence practice, Alan Harris Solicitors? .

1.1

Would it be fair to say that your firm, and therefore yourself, play an important part in the administration of justice in England? .

1.1

Would it be fair to say that your firm receives from Devon & Cornwall Police clients under the duty solicitor scheme? .

1.1

What would be the age of the youngest referral under the duty solicitor scheme? .

1.1

Would it be fair to say that some clients received by Alan Harris Solicitors under the duty solicitor scheme are highly vulnerable people? .

1.1

Would it be fair to say that such clients received by Alan Harris Solicitors under the duty solicitor scheme, considered to be highly vulnerable people, warrant a very high standard of Duty of Care? .

1.1

In your personal experience, has Alan Harris Solicitors always exercised a very high standard of Duty of Care to ALL of it's clients?

1.1

As a responsible person, both as a long-term employee of Alan Harris, and as someone subject yourself to the Laws of England, you would presumably view with the greatest concern even the smallest failure of a Duty of Care by Alan Harris Solicitors to vulnerable clients, am I right?

1.1

Have you ever even once become personally aware of a failure of a duty of care to any client of Alan Harris Solicitors during the course of your 25 years employment?

1.1

( if Yes ) Having become aware of this failure in a Duty of Care, what then happened?

1.1

( if No ) OK, so in the course of two and a half decades you have never once been aware of such a failing, which suggests an extremely finely run criminal defence practice being run to the highest standards, does it not?

1.1

Given this fortunate state of affairs, a brilliantly run firm, it must have come as an awful shock to you to realise that the sign Zen was holding for many weeks, asking The People of Plymouth to identify by name the criminal defence lawyer blackmailing boys into sex, was receiving - from people Zen had never met - one name consistently - ALAN HARRIS.

1.1

Can you please tell the court precisely what actions were taken, to your knowledge, by the partners of Alan Harris Solicitors, to determine if the allegations were true or false?

1.1

From your long personal experience of Alan Harris Solicitors, is it now, or has it ever been the practice that solicitors occasionally have sex with clients?

1.1

So we can agree that sex in the offices at Alan Harris Solicitors with clients is a definite No-No? .

1.1

Would you tell the Court which is your paramount duty - to the firm that employs you, or your Duty of Care to vulnerable male clients? Which is of most importance to you? .

1.1

So to be clear, you would not protect the reputation of Alan Harris Solicitors first and foremost, and ever ignore the rights of vulnerable male clients to whom your firm owes a Duty of Care at all times? .

1.1

Assuming someone sent a letter to Alan Harris Solicitors addressed to 'The Office', would you tell the Court what would happen to it as it is opened?

1.1

If that letter contained allegations made by Zen in 2001 in writing, setting out what Zen had been told by Man X001 about Man X001's sex with Alan Harris, it would have been first read by a legal secretary, would it not?

1.1

Can you confirm to the court if you are or are not aware of the letter I mention?

1.1

You see, it was Zen's intention, in writing that letter, that it would be read by a lady such as yourself, as it was his desire that the contents of his letter be known in every office within your offices within the hour. After all, we all know how ladies love to gossip, and this was hot gossip, was it not?

1.1

So to be clear, are you saying that no sex ever takes place in offices at Alan Harris Solicitors, to the best of your knowledge?

1.1

Bearing in mind how responsible you say your job is, would it give you cause for concern that multiple men say they were induced to have sex with Alan Harris in his office?

1.1

Would it give you cause for concern that 2 men say they were induced to have sex with Alan Harris in their homes, due to Alan Harris getting their address from their file, and calling around uninvited?

1.1

Wwould it give you cause for concern that one man says he was induced to have sex with Alan Harris in the Magistrates Court building?

1.1

Would it give you cause for concern that multiple men say they were in fear of how Alan Harris would direct their defence when they were having this sex with Alan Harris?

1.1

Suppose a male client brings private business documents into the offices at Alan Harris Solicitors, would he be entitled in your long experience to simply request their return, and be entitled to their return withour question?

1.1

Would it cause you concern that Man X002 has stated on numerous occasions that Alan Harris withheld Man X002's documents?

1.1

Would it cause you concern that Alan Harris demanded a very specific sex act from Man X002 before Alan Harris was willing to return Man X002's documents?

1.1

In your long experience, would such a demand be seen as acceptable or unacceptable at Alan Harris Solicitors? .

////2\\\\

QUESTIONS AN HONEST BARRISTER WOULD HAVE ASKED IN A NON-RIGGED COURT

2.1

These were false witnesses,
with a story so flimsy,
it would not bear cross-examination,
forcing the conspiracy
to rig the court
to guarantee success in pervert justice
( or how England is really governed ).

END

QUESTIONS AN HONEST BARRISTER WOULD HAVE ASKED IN A NON-RIGGED COURT