////////
16.47 pm 17 JAN 2019 - SECTION 36 'AMBUSH' BY CONSPIRACY
1.0
From: Dorset CPO <Dorset.CPO@cps.gsi.gov.uk>
Sent: 17 January 2013 16:47
To: 'Zen standfast4truth'
Subject: R v Zen Sparrow - trial 22/1/13
Dear sir,
Sent: 17 January 2013 16:47
To: 'Zen standfast4truth'
Subject: R v Zen Sparrow - trial 22/1/13
Dear sir,
1.1
We are making an application to the court
as detailed below
and herby serve a copy on you.
as detailed below
and herby serve a copy on you.
1.2
We have requested
that this application be listed at the earliest opportunity.
that this application be listed at the earliest opportunity.
1.3
If you have any views on this application
please would you direct them to the Plymouth Magistrates’ Court
who will be dealing with said application.
please would you direct them to the Plymouth Magistrates’ Court
who will be dealing with said application.
1.4
Yours faithfully,
Owen Holloway
District Crown Prosecutor
Owen Holloway
District Crown Prosecutor
////////
16.47 pm 17 JAN 2019 - SECTION 36 'AMBUSH' NOTICE BY CPS
2.1
Application is made
under Section 36 (2) (a) Youth Justice and Criminal evidence Act 1999
for the court to give a direction
to prohibit the accused
from cross examining the witness in person.
under Section 36 (2) (a) Youth Justice and Criminal evidence Act 1999
for the court to give a direction
to prohibit the accused
from cross examining the witness in person.
2.2
This is made upon the basis
that the quality of the evidence
given by the witnesses on cross examination
is likely to be diminished
and it would be likely to be improved
if a direction was given under this section
and that it would not be contrary to the interests of justice
to give such a direction.
that the quality of the evidence
given by the witnesses on cross examination
is likely to be diminished
and it would be likely to be improved
if a direction was given under this section
and that it would not be contrary to the interests of justice
to give such a direction.
2.3
The witnesses
have both expressed a view
that they would not be content
to be cross examined by the accused in person.
have both expressed a view
that they would not be content
to be cross examined by the accused in person.
2.4
The defendant
has already expressed a view via numerous Emails
of the likely questions to be raised;
many do not relate directly to the incident
, many questions are likely to be very personal and sexually graphic
but do not relate to the witnesses themselves;
the contents of each of the 11 Emails
are attached for reference.
has already expressed a view via numerous Emails
of the likely questions to be raised;
many do not relate directly to the incident
, many questions are likely to be very personal and sexually graphic
but do not relate to the witnesses themselves;
the contents of each of the 11 Emails
are attached for reference.
2.5
The court
is invited to appoint a qualified legal representative
to cross examine the witnesses
in the interests of the accused.
is invited to appoint a qualified legal representative
to cross examine the witnesses
in the interests of the accused.
2.6
Owen Holloway
DCP
West Wessex.
////////
Go2 Zen's reply
////////
NOTES
3.1
Note that Zen was fully aware BEFORE the 22 JAN 2013 trial
that it would be rigged from start to finish.
that it would be rigged from start to finish.
3.2
Remember, this is the THIRD MAJOR OCCASION
that Devon & Cornwall Police have perverted the course of 'justice'
in regard to Zen ( 1979, 1990-1993, 2013 ).
that Devon & Cornwall Police have perverted the course of 'justice'
in regard to Zen ( 1979, 1990-1993, 2013 ).
END
CPS AMBUSH 16.47 pm 17 JAN 2013
